Alix (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
zodiacal_light) wrote2011-01-11 04:21 pm
zodiacal_light) wrote2011-01-11 04:21 pm
Entry tags:
Venting again.
*sigh*
Why do people act like King Roald is an idiot? People over on glake are so derisive of him for being a peacemaker - what, that's a bad thing? Silly me, here I thought things like peace and diplomacy were good.
It's bad enough the text is incredibly condescending towards him for being a peacemaker and not a warmonger. Am I the only one who thinks he probably had to be, after Jasson's wars of expansion?
...I kinda want to do an AU now where King Roald continues Jasson's policies, and ends up tearing Tortall apart, but I don't think I could do it justice and I'm not sure I have much interesting to say.
I think the recent threads on glake have convinced me to give up on it once and for all. I'll probably pop in to see the new prompts, but the sheer idiocy over there recently is astounding. I thought better of that place, but at least I'll spare my blood pressure. I shouldn't have commented today, but I am, apparently, constitutionally incapable of not replying to utter morons.
But back to Roald. There are only two things he does that could be construed as stupid - his presumed suicide, and his not letting the pages study magic sooner, and in both cases we don't know what's going on there. We don't know for sure Roald did commit suicide - only that he'd missed a jump he'd made before, and Jon thought he'd killed himself. On the magic - we don't know his reasoning, or if it was even at Roald's direction that magic wasn't taught to pages. It could have been longstanding policy. It could have been at the discretion of the training master, in which case it would have been on Gareth's shoulders. We don't know, and so I'm not willing to call a man stupid over ... one debatably bad policy. Concerning pages.
But what really pisses me off is that neither of those examples are why people on glake have decided Roald is stupid. They've decided he's stupid because he's a peacemaker.
Am I the only person who thinks that's fucked up?
Why do people act like King Roald is an idiot? People over on glake are so derisive of him for being a peacemaker - what, that's a bad thing? Silly me, here I thought things like peace and diplomacy were good.
It's bad enough the text is incredibly condescending towards him for being a peacemaker and not a warmonger. Am I the only one who thinks he probably had to be, after Jasson's wars of expansion?
...I kinda want to do an AU now where King Roald continues Jasson's policies, and ends up tearing Tortall apart, but I don't think I could do it justice and I'm not sure I have much interesting to say.
I think the recent threads on glake have convinced me to give up on it once and for all. I'll probably pop in to see the new prompts, but the sheer idiocy over there recently is astounding. I thought better of that place, but at least I'll spare my blood pressure. I shouldn't have commented today, but I am, apparently, constitutionally incapable of not replying to utter morons.
But back to Roald. There are only two things he does that could be construed as stupid - his presumed suicide, and his not letting the pages study magic sooner, and in both cases we don't know what's going on there. We don't know for sure Roald did commit suicide - only that he'd missed a jump he'd made before, and Jon thought he'd killed himself. On the magic - we don't know his reasoning, or if it was even at Roald's direction that magic wasn't taught to pages. It could have been longstanding policy. It could have been at the discretion of the training master, in which case it would have been on Gareth's shoulders. We don't know, and so I'm not willing to call a man stupid over ... one debatably bad policy. Concerning pages.
But what really pisses me off is that neither of those examples are why people on glake have decided Roald is stupid. They've decided he's stupid because he's a peacemaker.
Am I the only person who thinks that's fucked up?
no subject
Am I the only person who thinks that's fucked up?
Definitely not. Glad I haven't stumbled across that particular thread.
Unfortunately since Glake is full of members of all ages and extreme variety of fandom-interest, we go through peaks and valleys when it comes to discourse. It's definitely more of a creativity-driven forum than discussion, and the discussions aren't always as fully thought out as they could be - likely due to different interest levels in debate as well as intellect.
I go through phases where I don't even want to read the threads. :/ Which probably isn't good for a moderator.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Yeah, and that was obvious even when I signed up. (I read, like, a ton of the old threads before joining.) It just looks like glake might not really be a good place for me, which, eh. It's not a perfect fit for everyone. :)
no subject
no subject
no subject
Well, maybe in a month or so I will see about trying to set up some kind of tastymeta and fic comm here, although I'm fairly bad at recruiting membership.
no subject
I'm crap at recruiting membership, but if you started that I'd do my best to push it.